Comments for Web of Data

Comment on Is Google a large-scale contributor to the LOD cloud? by GMail et le RDF | riduidel's wordpress

GMail et le RDF | riduidel's wordpress — Mon, 06 May 2013 07:13:39 +0000

[...] en fait, c'est surtout ça qui est chouette. Google met à disposition mes données publiques dans un format compatible avec RDF. Pour les données privées, il existe évidement des APIs pour tout, sauf les tÄches de GMail [...]

Comment on Oh – it is data on the Web by OData ou/et RDF ? | Blog de JP Gouigoux

OData ou/et RDF ? | Blog de JP Gouigoux — Mon, 08 Apr 2013 22:18:31 +0000

[...] de ce billet est dans la polémique existant ça et là sur la supériorité de RDF par rapport à OData pour l’exposition des données sur internet [...]

Comment on Cloud Cipher Capabilities by Noam Shendar

Noam Shendar — Sat, 30 Mar 2013 00:37:18 +0000

An update regarding AWS: users of Zadara Storage at AWS have the option of server-based encryption of data-at-rest where the key encryption key (KEK) is user-generated. If you’d like to know more, see this security brief outlining data privacy and encryption: http://bit.ly/ZUDndd (disclaimer, I’m obviously with Zadara Storage)

Comment on Cloud Cipher Capabilities by Bit Bucket

Bit Bucket — Sun, 24 Mar 2013 20:19:05 +0000

I think the reason AWS is the only one to support some sort of “server side encryption” is because the others saw that it doesn’t make any sense. Maybe the reasoning went something like, “this doesn’t make sense but customers are asking for it so let’s do it anyways”. I mean why on earth, if you have data worth encrypting, would you trust some random third party on the internet to have your keys and do it all for you? What’s the point? Any time Amazon needs to look at your data, they can – they have the key!

And SSL/TLS is horribly broken and vulnerable to MITM attacks too.

If you care about the privacy of your data, encrypt it properly before it leaves your control. Otherwise do not put it in clouds, point finale.

Comment on Cloud Cipher Capabilities by Will Daniels

Will Daniels — Sun, 24 Mar 2013 18:34:30 +0000

Even where encryption is available, there are also questions of trust and legal jurisdiction about the cloud service provider. Storage is one thing, you can decrypt client-side and keep your private key outside the cloud, but if you want to use cloud computing power to actually process your encrypted data the problem becomes more difficult. There is at least one company working on solutions to these problems: http://cloudtomo.com (disclaimer, I work there).

Comment on Hosted MapReduce and Hadoop offerings by Elephant filet | Web of Data

Elephant filet | Web of Data — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:37:58 +0000

[...] elaborate a bit on this in the context of where Hadoop is used in a shared setup, for example in hosted offerings or, say, within an enterprise that runs different systems such as Storm, Lucene/Solr, and Hadoop on [...]

Comment on Data and the Web – a great many of choices by Tim Berners-Lee Proposes Open Data Rating | Open Atlanta

Tim Berners-Lee Proposes Open Data Rating | Open Atlanta — Fri, 22 Feb 2013 17:13:06 +0000

[...] Excellent! The data is not only available via the Web but now everyone can use the data easily. On the other hand, it’s still data on the Web and not data in the Web. [...]

Comment on Can NoSQL help us in processing Linked Data? by Storing and querying RDF data with Redis | seevl.net

Storing and querying RDF data with Redis | seevl.net — Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:52:37 +0000

[...] querying structured data? Are you building a RDF-store with more advanced SPARQL capabilities or comparing solutions? Let us know in the comments – or drop us a [...]

Comment on MapR, Europe and me by mhausenblas

mhausenblas — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 06:06:41 +0000

Thanks a lot, Danny!

Comment on MapR, Europe and me by dannyayers

dannyayers — Mon, 07 Jan 2013 17:51:26 +0000

Congrats Michael! Sounds interesting, and I know you’ve a lot to offer them